Our Expert in Morocco
No results available
Last updated: 14 May 2026
The enforcement of foreign judgments in Morocco has entered a new era following the adoption and publication of the reformed Code of Civil Procedure in the Bulletin Officiel in February 2026. For the first time, Moroccan law expressly consolidates the rules on international jurisdiction, recognition, and exequatur into a single modern framework, and, critically for creditors, authorises Moroccan courts to order provisional and conservative measures that are directly executable on Moroccan territory. This guide provides foreign investors, in-house counsel, and cross-border litigators with the step-by-step roadmap they need: from assembling documents and filing for exequatur, through obtaining urgent asset freezes, to seizing and recovering assets against companies and individuals in Morocco.
Yes, foreign judgments can be enforced in Morocco, but only after obtaining an exequatur (a Moroccan court order recognising the foreign judgment and authorising its enforcement). The 2026 reforms do not eliminate this requirement, but they streamline it, clarify the grounds for recognition and refusal, and add powerful new provisional-measure tools for judgment creditors.
If you hold a foreign judgment and need to enforce it against assets or a debtor in Morocco, the immediate action steps are:
The sections below walk through each of these steps in detail, with checklists, timelines, and practical warnings drawn from experienced enforcement practice in Morocco.
Morocco’s new Code of Civil Procedure was adopted on 11 February 2026 and published in the Bulletin Officiel on 23 February 2026. Press coverage indicates the new code is expected to enter full force on 24 August 2026, six months after its official publication. The reform replaces the piecemeal provisions of the 1974 Code with a consolidated framework addressing international jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, and, for the first time in express statutory terms, Moroccan courts’ power to order provisional and conservative measures intended to be executed within Morocco.
Industry observers expect these changes to materially reduce uncertainty for foreign investors seeking enforcement in Morocco. The prior framework was criticised for its fragmented structure, outdated procedural rules, and silence on key questions, particularly whether Moroccan courts could grant interim relief in support of a foreign proceeding. The 2026 reforms address each of these gaps.
| Key Reform Point | Prior Position | Practical Effect (2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Consolidated international jurisdiction rules | Scattered across the 1974 Code and case law; inconsistent application | Single statutory framework for determining when Moroccan courts have jurisdiction over cross-border disputes, clearer for both claimants and defendants |
| Recognition and exequatur procedure | General provisions; limited statutory guidance on grounds for refusal | Codified admissibility requirements and refusal grounds aligned with international norms (finality, jurisdiction, public policy, service, no contradictory judgments) |
| Provisional / conservative measures | No express statutory authorisation for Moroccan courts to order conservatory measures executable in Morocco in support of foreign proceedings | Moroccan courts may now grant attachments, freezing orders, and preservation measures directly, a critical tool for preventing asset dissipation before exequatur |
| Bilateral treaties and reciprocity | Morocco party to several bilateral judicial cooperation agreements (e.g., with France, Spain, Italy); reciprocity applied case-by-case | Treaty-based enforcement continues under streamlined rules; non-treaty enforcement remains available subject to the reformed exequatur conditions |
The new code applies to all civil and commercial proceedings, including enforcement of foreign judgments in Morocco. As reported by SNRT News and confirmed in the Bulletin Officiel, the provisions governing international jurisdiction and recognition of foreign decisions form a distinct title within the code, ensuring they are easily identifiable and self-contained. Proceedings already pending at the date of entry into force are generally expected to be governed by the procedural rules in effect at the time of filing, although transitional provisions should be reviewed with Moroccan counsel on a case-by-case basis.
To enforce a foreign judgment in Morocco, you must obtain an exequatur, a judicial order from a competent Moroccan court declaring the foreign decision enforceable on Moroccan territory. The exequatur proceeding is not a review of the merits of the underlying dispute. Instead, the Moroccan court examines whether the foreign judgment meets a defined set of formal and substantive conditions.
The typical procedural flow is as follows:
| Document | Format Requirements | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Certified copy of the foreign judgment | Authenticated by the issuing court; legalised or apostilled | Must include the operative part (dispositif) and the court’s reasoning |
| Certificate of finality / enforceability | Issued by the foreign court or competent authority | Confirms the judgment is final, binding, and not subject to ordinary appeal |
| Proof of service on the defendant | Original or certified copy | Must demonstrate the defendant was duly notified and had the opportunity to appear |
| Certified Arabic translation of all documents | Performed by a certified sworn translator recognised by Moroccan courts | Courts will not accept unofficial or machine translations |
| Power of attorney for Moroccan counsel | Legalised or apostilled | Required for counsel to file on behalf of the foreign creditor |
| Proof of jurisdiction of the foreign court | Statement of jurisdictional basis or copy of the relevant procedural order | May include the parties’ agreement on jurisdiction, if applicable |
Moroccan courts may refuse exequatur on several grounds. Understanding and pre-emptively addressing these risks is essential to a successful enforcement of foreign judgments in Morocco:
One of the most significant changes introduced by the 2026 reforms is the express statutory authorisation for Moroccan courts to order provisional and conservative measures, commonly referred to as conservatory measures, that are directly executable in Morocco. This is a critical development for creditors concerned about asset dissipation during the months it takes to obtain exequatur.
Provisional measures in Morocco typically include:
Under the 2026 framework, the applicant must demonstrate a prima facie claim (credible evidence supporting the existence and enforceability of the foreign judgment) and a genuine risk that enforcement will be frustrated if measures are not granted urgently. The evidentiary threshold is lower than for final enforcement, the court does not assess the merits in depth but evaluates whether the claim is sufficiently serious and the risk of dissipation is real.
Where the situation is genuinely urgent, for example, where there are concrete indications that a debtor is liquidating bank accounts or transferring assets, the creditor may apply ex parte (without prior notice to the debtor) before the president of the competent court sitting as judge of urgent matters (juge des référés). An effective ex parte application should include:
The likely practical effect of the 2026 reforms is that ex parte conservatory attachments can be obtained within days of filing, compared to the months required for exequatur. This gives creditors a meaningful window to protect their position.
Conservatory measures are inherently temporary. Once exequatur is granted, or if the creditor obtains a fresh Moroccan judgment, the provisional measures must be converted into enforcement measures. In practice, this means the conservatory attachment over a bank account becomes a definitive garnishment, and the provisional inscription on real property converts to a full enforcement lien. Failure to pursue the underlying exequatur proceeding within the statutory time limits may result in the provisional measures being lifted, with potential liability for the creditor. Moroccan counsel should establish a clear litigation timeline at the outset to avoid this risk.
Once an exequatur order is obtained, the foreign judgment has the same enforceability as a domestic Moroccan judgment. The creditor can then proceed to seize assets using the full range of enforcement tools available under Moroccan law. Knowing how to seize assets in Morocco, and the tactical differences between enforcement against companies versus individuals, is essential for an effective recovery.
Step 1: Asset intelligence and pre-litigation tracing. Before initiating enforcement, the creditor should invest in identifying the debtor’s Moroccan assets. This may involve searches of the land registry (Conservation Foncière), the commercial register (Registre du Commerce), bank inquiries (through court orders once proceedings are underway), and, where appropriate, private investigation. Early asset tracing informs the choice of provisional measures and prevents wasted enforcement efforts against an asset-light debtor.
Step 2: Using provisional measures to freeze assets. As described above, conservatory attachments can freeze bank accounts, receivables, securities, and registered movable assets. For real property, a provisional judicial mortgage can be registered to prevent sale or transfer. These measures should be sought as early as possible, ideally before the debtor becomes aware of the enforcement proceedings.
Step 3: Enforcement against companies. Where the judgment debtor is a company incorporated or operating in Morocco, enforcement targets the company’s own assets. To enforce a judgment against a company in Morocco, creditors should note that Moroccan law generally respects corporate separateness, a judgment against a parent company cannot automatically be enforced against a Moroccan subsidiary’s assets. Piercing the corporate veil requires a separate showing that the subsidiary is a mere façade or that the corporate form has been abused. This is a fact-intensive inquiry that should be evaluated with Moroccan counsel at the pre-filing stage.
Step 4: Enforcement methods. The principal enforcement methods under Moroccan law include:
| Asset Type | Typical Seizure Method | Practical Consideration |
|---|---|---|
| Bank accounts | Garnishment order (saisie-arrêt) served on the bank | Effective and fast; the bank must freeze the account upon receipt of the order. Debtor may challenge the seizure. |
| Receivables and securities | Garnishment of third-party debts; attachment of securities held by custodians | Requires identification of the third-party debtor or custodian. Court order specifying the receivable or securities is essential. |
| Real property | Seizure and judicial sale (saisie immobilière) | Longer process (6–18 months from seizure to sale); requires registration of the seizure at the Conservation Foncière. Sale proceeds distributed to creditors by court order. |
| Movable assets (vehicles, equipment, inventory) | Seizure by judicial officer and subsequent public auction | Physical access required; debtor may attempt to relocate or conceal assets. Apply for conservatory attachment early. |
| Shares in Moroccan companies | Attachment and forced sale of shares; notification to the company | Valuation may be required. Minority-share sales can be complex if the company’s articles restrict transfers. |
Step 5: Cross-border enforcement considerations. Morocco is party to several bilateral judicial cooperation agreements, notably with France, Spain, Italy, and other Francophone and Arab League states, which may simplify enforcement or provide reciprocal recognition routes. Where no treaty exists, the exequatur procedure under the reformed Code applies in full. The question of reciprocity (whether the foreign country would enforce a Moroccan judgment) has traditionally been considered by Moroccan courts, although the 2026 reforms are expected to reduce its practical significance in favour of the codified admissibility conditions.
Step 6: Instructing local bailiffs and counsel. All physical enforcement acts, service of seizure orders, inventory of movable assets, supervision of judicial sales, must be carried out by a licensed judicial officer (huissier de justice). Creditors should instruct their Moroccan counsel to coordinate closely with the huissier to ensure strict compliance with procedural formalities, as any irregularity may provide grounds for the debtor to challenge the seizure.
Realistic timeline expectations are essential for any creditor planning the enforcement of foreign judgments in Morocco. While every case is different, the following ranges reflect current practice:
Typical cost ranges include court filing fees (generally modest by international standards), counsel retainer and hourly fees, certified translation and legalisation costs, and judicial officer fees for service and enforcement acts. Creditors should also budget for potential security or bond requirements in connection with provisional measures, and for the costs of asset tracing. The total cost of enforcement will depend heavily on the complexity of the case and the nature of the assets targeted.
Procedural traps to watch for: The limitation period for enforcement must be monitored, failing to act within the prescribed period can extinguish the right to enforce. Parallel proceedings (where the debtor files a competing action in Morocco or challenges the foreign judgment’s finality) can delay enforcement significantly. Early and proactive coordination with Moroccan counsel is the most effective mitigation.
The following checklist summarises the key steps for enforcement of foreign judgments in Morocco. It is designed for use by in-house counsel and foreign law firms instructing Moroccan practitioners:
Downloadable sample documents, including a provisional-measures application template, a document authentication checklist, and an exequatur filing checklist, are being prepared for publication as companion resources to this guide.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Rachid Benzakour at Benzakour Law Firm, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 1 minute ago
posted 23 minutes ago
posted 46 minutes ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Advisory Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message