Our Expert in India
No results available
The Income‑tax Act, 2025, India’s first ground‑up rewrite of direct‑tax legislation since 1961, took effect on 1 April 2026, accompanied by the new Income‑tax Rules, 2026. For every CFO, Head of Tax and General Counsel operating in or through India, the transition demands far more than a reading exercise: payroll codes need reconfiguring, vendor contracts require updated withholding clauses, MAT computations must be re‑modelled, and reporting calendars have shifted. This article delivers a practitioner‑focused, step‑by‑step compliance checklist for income tax act tax planning India, prioritised by urgency, mapped to entity type, and structured so that in‑house teams can begin execution immediately.
Every statutory reference below traces to the official Act text published on the Income Tax Department portal and the ITD’s FAQs on Interplay and Transition.
The Income‑tax Act, 2025 consolidates and simplifies the 1961 statute, but simplification does not mean inaction. Below are the seven headline changes that affect corporate tax planning India‑wide, effective 1 April 2026:
Immediate top 5 actions: (1) Update all TDS/TCS codes in payroll and vendor‑payment systems; (2) Issue vendor notifications with new withholding references; (3) Reconcile Form 26AS/AIS for FY 2025‑26 before filing under new timelines; (4) Re‑model MAT/final‑tax impact on FY 2026‑27 provisions; (5) Appoint an internal transition owner accountable for the 90‑day playbook below.
Under the Income‑tax Act, 1961, a company earning income between 1 April 2025 and 31 March 2026 filed its return for “Assessment Year 2026‑27.” The Income‑tax Act, 2025 abolishes this staggered terminology. Income earned from 1 April 2026 onward is assessed in the same Tax Year 2026‑27. The practical consequence is that advance‑tax instalment dates, TDS deposit deadlines and return‑filing due dates now reference a single year label, reducing the scope for confusion in system‑generated challans and demand notices. However, transitional provisions preserve the old AY references for proceedings already initiated before 1 April 2026, as clarified by the ITD’s FAQs on Interplay and Transition.
Example 1, Domestic company: A private limited company’s Q1 advance‑tax instalment (due 15 June 2026) is now tagged to Tax Year 2026‑27 rather than AY 2027‑28. ERP challan templates must reflect this change or risk mismatched credits on Form 26AS.
Example 2, Foreign parent with Indian subsidiary: A UK parent remitting royalties to its Indian subsidiary must apply the withholding rate referenced under the 2025 Act section (not the old Section 195 of the 1961 Act) for payments made on or after 1 April 2026, while also verifying the applicable DTAA rate.
| Term | Old Rule (Act, 1961) | New Rule (Act, 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Year label | Previous Year + Assessment Year | Single “Tax Year” |
| Advance‑tax reference | Tagged to AY (year following income year) | Tagged to Tax Year (same year as income) |
| Return filing terminology | “Return for AY 20XX‑XX” | “Return for Tax Year 20XX‑XX” |
| Pending proceedings | AY references continue until disposal | Transitional provisions map old AY to new TY |
The 2025 Act retains the 60‑day / 182‑day residence tests but consolidates scattered provisions into a single chapter, reducing interpretive disputes. Source‑of‑income rules now explicitly address digital advertising revenue and cloud‑service fees, an area previously governed solely by CBDT circulars. Multinational groups with Indian operations should map each revenue stream against the updated sourcing chapter to confirm whether withholding obligations have expanded or narrowed under the new text.
The transition window is narrow. Below is a phased playbook that tax teams can adopt from 1 April 2026 onward. Each action is tagged with a suggested owner and a hard deadline to ensure nothing falls through the cracks.
| Action | Owner | Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Update TDS/TCS codes in ERP | IT + Tax | Day 1 (before April payroll) |
| Vendor notification email | Procurement + Tax | Day 3 |
| Fresh lower/nil certificates filed | Tax | Day 7 |
| Form 26AS/AIS reconciliation | Finance | Day 21 |
| Internal training completed | HR + Tax | Day 30 |
| Contract amendment review | Legal + Tax | Day 30 |
| MAT/final‑tax model ready | CFO + Tax | Day 60 |
| TP documentation updated | Tax + External advisor | Day 75 |
| Test ITR filing | Tax + IT | Day 90 |
The TDS changes 2026 represent the single largest operational burden of the transition. Every withholding section from the 1961 Act has been re‑numbered under the Income‑tax Act, 2025, and several categories have been merged or split. Failure to update challan codes by the first payment cycle of April 2026 will result in mismatched credits on Form 26AS, triggering demand notices and interest under the new Act’s penalty provisions.
The ITD’s FAQs on Interplay and Transition provide a comprehensive old‑to‑new mapping table. Below are the most commonly encountered withholding categories for businesses:
| Payment Type | Old TDS Rule (Act, 1961) | New TDS Action Required (Act, 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Salaries | Section 192 | Map to corresponding 2025 Act section; update payroll TDS computation to reference Tax Year (not AY) |
| Contractor payments | Section 194C | Recode vendor master with new section reference; verify threshold limits under Rules, 2026 |
| Professional/technical fees | Section 194J | Confirm whether 2% or 10% rate applies under consolidated 2025 Act provision; update vendor template |
| Rent | Section 194‑I | Recode challan; verify if threshold for non‑deduction has changed under Rules, 2026 |
| Payments to non‑residents | Section 195 | Re‑map to 2025 Act equivalent; verify DTAA rate applicability and collect Tax Residency Certificate |
| TCS on sale of goods | Section 206C(1H) | Update invoice/billing system with new TCS section reference and revised turnover threshold |
Salaries: An employee earning ₹18 lakh per annum under the new tax regime will have TDS computed under the 2025 Act slab rates (which broadly mirror the rates announced in the Union Budget 2026‑27). The payroll system must reference Tax Year 2026‑27 on every pay‑slip and Form 16, not AY 2027‑28.
Vendor payments: A company paying ₹50 lakh annually to a facilities‑management contractor must apply the new Act section (replacing old Section 194C) on each invoice processed from 1 April 2026. If the vendor holds a lower‑withholding certificate issued under the 1961 Act, that certificate is no longer valid; a fresh certificate under the 2025 Act must be obtained.
Lower and nil withholding certificates must now be applied for under the 2025 Act’s corresponding provision. Businesses should maintain a register of all certificates received, their validity periods and the payments against which they have been applied. During faceless assessments, the Assessing Officer may request this register electronically; pre‑populating a digital audit trail will reduce response times and penalty exposure.
Vendor notification template (suggested wording): “Dear [Vendor], with effect from 1 April 2026, all TDS deductions on payments to your firm will reference section numbers under the Income‑tax Act, 2025 (replacing references to the Income‑tax Act, 1961). Please furnish your updated PAN, confirm your TDS rate expectation and, if applicable, provide a fresh lower/nil withholding certificate under the 2025 Act. For queries, contact [Tax Team email].”
One of the most consequential changes for corporate tax planning India‑wide is the treatment of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) as a final tax. Under the 1961 Act, companies paying MAT could carry forward the credit for set‑off against regular tax liability in subsequent years (up to 15 years). The Income‑tax Act, 2025 eliminates this carry‑forward mechanism for the relevant category of taxpayers, treating the MAT paid (at an effective rate of approximately 14 per cent after applicable surcharge adjustments) as the final tax for the year.
Consider a domestic company with book profits of ₹100 crore and a regular tax liability (under the 22 per cent concessional regime) of ₹12 crore. Under the 1961 Act, the company would have paid MAT of approximately ₹15 crore and carried forward ₹3 crore as MAT credit. Under the 2025 Act, the ₹15 crore is final, no credit is generated. If the company’s regular tax liability rises in Year 2, the ₹3 crore that would have been set off is permanently lost. CFOs must re‑model multi‑year cashflow projections accordingly.
Industry observers expect three practical responses to emerge. First, companies already on the concessional 22 per cent regime may reassess whether opting out (if permitted under the Act’s transitional provisions) yields a better after‑tax outcome. Second, loss‑making companies that relied on MAT credit accumulation to smooth future tax outflows will need to build the permanent cash‑cost into their budgets immediately. Third, groups undertaking restructurings, mergers, demergers or slump sales, should model whether completing the transaction before or after the MAT credit cut‑off date affects total group tax cost. For M&A‑related tax implications, the interaction with the IBC Amendment Act, 2026 and CCI merger‑control reforms should be considered concurrently.
For multinational enterprises, cross‑border tax planning India is shaped by three sets of changes under the 2025 Act: updated sourcing rules, refined PE definitions and tighter transfer‑pricing documentation standards.
The Act clarifies that certain digital‑service arrangements, including cloud computing, SaaS subscriptions and remote technical support, may trigger a taxable presence in India even where no physical office exists, depending on the revenue thresholds and user‑base metrics prescribed in the Rules, 2026. Companies operating cross‑border joint ventures in India should audit existing inter‑company service agreements to determine whether new sourcing rules create an Indian tax liability where none existed before.
Payments to non‑residents (royalties, fees for technical services, interest) must now be deducted under the 2025 Act’s consolidated withholding chapter. The applicable rate is the lower of the domestic rate prescribed under the Act or the rate specified in the relevant DTAA, but the procedural requirements for claiming treaty benefits (Tax Residency Certificate, Form 10F equivalent under Rules, 2026) have been tightened. Late or incorrect filings attract higher penalty rates than under the 1961 Act.
The Rules, 2026 mandate that transfer‑pricing documentation, master file, local file and CbCR, explicitly reference Act 2025 section numbers and align with the OECD’s updated 2024 guidance on financial transactions. Groups should update documentation templates by Day 75 of the transition playbook.
Red flags checklist for cross‑border contracts:
The 2025 Act rationalises capital gains computation by streamlining holding‑period classifications and modifying cost‑indexation treatment. Transactions closed on or after 1 April 2026 are governed entirely by the new rules.
The Act consolidates the previous multi‑tier holding‑period framework (12 months for listed equity, 24 months for unlisted shares, 36 months for immovable property under certain conditions) into a simplified two‑tier structure. Indexation benefits, which previously applied to long‑term capital gains on most asset classes, have been modified, early indications suggest the benefit is curtailed or replaced by a concessional flat rate for certain categories. Tax teams should verify the applicable rule for each asset class against the Rules, 2026 before processing any disposal.
| Transaction Type | Tax Consequence (Old Act, 1961) | Action Under Capital Gains Rules 2026 (New Act) |
|---|---|---|
| Sale of listed equity (held > 12 months) | LTCG at 10% above ₹1 lakh exemption (post July 2024 rate adjustments) | Verify revised rate and exemption threshold under 2025 Act; update broker settlement statements |
| Sale of unlisted shares | LTCG at 20% with indexation (if held > 24 months) | Confirm new holding period and whether indexation is available or replaced by flat rate |
| Slump sale / business transfer | LTCG with net‑worth computation | Recalculate net worth under 2025 Act definitions; verify reporting schedule in revised ITR |
| Immovable property transfer | LTCG at 20% with indexation (held > 24/36 months) | Validate new holding‑period threshold; confirm stamp‑duty valuation rules under Rules, 2026 |
The Income‑tax Rules, 2026 overhaul ITR forms to align with the Act’s simplified chapter structure. Material changes include new disclosure schedules for crypto‑asset income, expanded related‑party transaction reporting fields and a mandatory reconciliation schedule linking AIS data with reported income.
The shift to the 2025 Act resets certain procedural clocks. In‑house counsel should pay particular attention to the revised timelines for responding to faceless assessment notices, filing objections before the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) and appealing to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
| Risk | Mitigation Step | Escalation Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Mismatch between old AY references in demand notices and new TY references | Maintain a mapping register of old AY → new TY for all open proceedings; respond promptly citing transitional provisions | Head of Tax |
| Expired lower/nil withholding certificates applied post 1 April 2026 | Audit all certificates on Day 1; file fresh applications immediately; halt payments until valid certificate obtained | Tax Manager |
| Loss of MAT credit carry‑forward in ongoing disputes | Assess pending MAT credit claims; file protective applications under transitional provisions if available | CFO + External Counsel |
| Inadequate documentation for faceless assessment | Digitise and index all supporting records (invoices, board resolutions, TP study) in ITD‑compliant formats | Legal + IT |
| Incorrect capital gains computation on deals straddling the transition date | Bifurcate gains into pre‑ and post‑1 April 2026 components; obtain valuation reports as at 31 March 2026 | Tax + M&A Lead |
Preservation checklist: Retain, in electronic format, all advance‑tax challans, TDS certificates (Form 16/16A), transfer‑pricing benchmarking studies, board resolutions approving inter‑company transactions, and correspondence with the ITD for a minimum of eight years from the end of the relevant Tax Year, or as otherwise prescribed under the Rules, 2026.
| Entity Type | Major Reporting Obligations Under Income‑tax Act, 2025 | Immediate Checklist Items (First 90 Days) |
|---|---|---|
| Private company (domestic) | TDS/TCS under new section numbers; revised ITR with expanded schedules; MAT/final‑tax computation; tax‑audit report in prescribed format under Rules, 2026 |
|
| Listed company | All private‑company obligations plus enhanced related‑party disclosure schedules; quarterly advance‑tax instalments tagged to Tax Year; SEBI‑interface data alignment |
|
| LLP / Partnership | TDS on contractor/professional payments; partner profit‑allocation reporting under revised schedule; capital gains on asset disposals |
|
| Foreign branch / PE | Withholding on payments to non‑residents; TP documentation (master file, local file, CbCR); new residency and PE determination under 2025 Act chapter; branch‑profit attribution |
|
| Non‑resident (receiving Indian‑source income) | Withholding at source; treaty‑rate application; capital‑gains reporting on Indian asset disposals; Form 10F equivalent under new rules |
|
The Income‑tax Act, 2025 is not a future event, it is operational. Every day of delay in updating systems, notifying vendors and re‑modelling tax provisions increases the risk of mismatched credits, penalty interest and avoidable litigation. The compliance checklist for businesses set out in this guide provides a structured, prioritised path from Day 0 through Day 90.
By Day 30: TDS/TCS codes updated, vendor notifications issued, Form 26AS reconciled, internal training completed. By Day 60: MAT/final‑tax impact modelled, advance‑tax instalments recalculated, contracts amended. By Day 90: TP documentation updated, test ITR filed, dispute‑readiness protocol in place.
The checklist is designed to be downloaded, assigned and tracked. For entity‑specific guidance, particularly for cross‑border structures, M&A transactions straddling the transition date, or complex MAT credit positions, professional advisory support is strongly recommended. The transition from the 1961 Act to the 2025 Act is the most significant reform in Indian direct‑tax history in over six decades; proactive income tax act tax planning India‑wide will separate compliant, audit‑ready organisations from those exposed to unnecessary cost and risk.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Tushar Jarwal at DMD Advocates, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 16 minutes ago
posted 38 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Advisory Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message