Our Expert in Australia
No results available
Australia’s employer sponsored visas framework is undergoing its most significant overhaul in years. From 1 July 2026, every business that wants to hire overseas staff in Australia must contend with a new Approved Work Sponsor register, higher minimum salary thresholds, and tightened record‑keeping obligations introduced under the Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1). For HR managers, general counsel, SMB owners and recruitment leads, the central compliance question is now unavoidable: can you still sponsor a given role cost‑effectively and compliantly after the operative date? This guide explains exactly what is changing, maps each reform to concrete employer actions, and provides a step‑by‑step sponsor compliance checklist designed to keep your organisation audit‑ready.
The Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1), registered on the Federal Register of Legislation, restructures several pillars of the employer sponsorship system. Rather than a single headline change, the reforms introduce a package of interlocking measures that affect the full lifecycle of a sponsored hire: from initial sponsor approval through nomination, employment and ongoing compliance. The Department of Home Affairs has published updated guidance confirming the operative date and the key measures summarised below.
Under the new framework, every employer that wishes to nominate a worker for a Subclass 482 (Skills in Demand), Subclass 494 (Skilled Employer Sponsored Regional) or Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa must first be listed on the Approved Work Sponsor register. This replaces the existing Standard Business Sponsorship (SBS) approval process with a more structured, publicly searchable register.
Industry observers expect the register to function as both a compliance tool and a transparency mechanism. To qualify, employers will need to demonstrate:
Businesses that hold a current Standard Business Sponsorship approval should check with the Department of Home Affairs whether transitional provisions allow automatic migration to the new register or whether a fresh application is required.
From 1 July 2026, the Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold (TSMIT), the minimum salary that must be offered to a sponsored worker, increases. The TSMIT applies across the Skills in Demand visa (Subclass 482) streams and sets the floor below which no nomination can be approved. Employers must also meet the separate market salary rate requirement, which demands that the sponsored worker be paid at least as much as an equivalent Australian worker in the same role and location.
| Threshold measure | Pre‑1 July 2026 | From 1 July 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| TSMIT (general floor) | $73,150 per annum | $76,515 per annum (indexed) |
| Core Skills stream, 482 visa salary threshold | $73,150 | $76,515 |
| Specialist Skills stream, high‑income pathway | $135,000 | $141,300 (indexed) |
| Market salary rate obligation | Equivalent Australian worker rate | Unchanged, still required on top of the TSMIT floor |
The TSMIT is the legislated minimum. If the market salary rate for a given occupation exceeds the TSMIT, the employer must pay the higher of the two figures. Industry observers expect the Department to continue indexing the TSMIT annually, so employers should budget for incremental increases in future financial years.
| Date | Change | Employer action |
|---|---|---|
| 1 July 2026 | Approved Work Sponsor register commences; increased TSMIT and stream thresholds take effect | Apply to (or confirm status on) the register; recheck every nominated role against the new thresholds; update offer letters and payroll |
| 1 October 2026 | Transitional period for existing SBS holders concludes (anticipated) | Notify affected sponsored employees; lodge adjusted nominations or withdraw and re‑advertise non‑compliant roles |
| Ongoing | Intensified compliance monitoring and penalty regime | Maintain records for at least five years; prepare for random and triggered audits |
Not every employer will be affected in the same way. The practical impact depends on business size, location, the seniority of roles being sponsored, and existing salary bands. The matrix below helps you identify where your organisation sits and what to prioritise.
| Role type / scenario | Likely impact | Recommended next step |
|---|---|---|
| Junior or entry‑level roles currently paid between $70,000–$76,515 | High. These roles may fall below the new TSMIT floor. | Recalculate total remuneration; increase base salary or reclassify the role if business‑justified. |
| Mid‑level technical or professional roles paid above $80,000 | Moderate. Likely still above the TSMIT, but the market salary rate test may require an uplift. | Benchmark against comparable roles using ABS wage data and industry surveys. |
| Senior or specialist roles paid above $141,300 | Low. These roles qualify for the Specialist Skills stream with fewer restrictions. | Confirm the occupation is on the relevant skilled list and that the salary is documented in a written contract. |
| Regional employers (Subclass 494 stream) | Moderate. Regional concessions may offset some threshold impact, but the register requirement still applies. | Check regional designated area postcodes; confirm eligibility for regional streams and any concession provisions. |
If a nominated role involves part‑time hours (and the pro‑rated salary equivalent falls below the TSMIT), or if the position relies heavily on bonuses, commissions or non‑cash benefits to reach the minimum, it is likely to be flagged during the nomination assessment. The Department assesses guaranteed base salary, not variable earnings. Employers relying on overtime or performance bonuses to meet the threshold should restructure the offer to include a compliant fixed base.
The following checklist is designed for HR managers and in‑house counsel to work through systematically in the weeks before and after 1 July 2026. Each item addresses a discrete compliance obligation under the new regime.
Budgeting for employer sponsored visas in Australia requires looking beyond the raw TSMIT figure. Employers must account for superannuation, on‑costs, and the practical difference between the legislated floor and the market salary rate. The three scenarios below illustrate how costs change under the new thresholds.
| Component | Pre‑1 July 2026 | From 1 July 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum base salary (TSMIT) | $73,150 | $76,515 |
| Superannuation (12%) | $8,778 | $9,182 |
| Workers’ comp & payroll tax (est. 6%) | $4,389 | $4,591 |
| Estimated total employer cost | $86,317 | $90,288 |
| Annual uplift | , | +$3,971 |
For this role, the market salary rate for a junior developer in a metropolitan area may already exceed $76,515, in which case the employer must pay the market rate, not merely the TSMIT. Industry observers expect that benchmarking against ABS Average Weekly Earnings data and relevant industry awards will be essential to demonstrate compliance.
| Component | Pre‑1 July 2026 | From 1 July 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Offered base salary | $95,000 | $95,000 (no increase needed if above TSMIT) |
| Superannuation (12%) | $11,400 | $11,400 |
| Workers’ comp & payroll tax (est. 6%) | $5,700 | $5,700 |
| Estimated total employer cost | $112,100 | $112,100 |
Because this role is already well above the TSMIT, the direct financial impact of the threshold increase is nil. However, the employer must still confirm that $95,000 meets or exceeds the market salary rate for an equivalent Australian engineer in the same location. If ABS data or an industry salary survey indicates the market rate has risen to $100,000, the offer must be adjusted upward.
| Component | Pre‑1 July 2026 | From 1 July 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum for Specialist Skills stream | $135,000 | $141,300 |
| Superannuation (12%) | $16,200 | $16,956 |
| Workers’ comp & payroll tax (est. 6%) | $8,100 | $8,478 |
| Estimated total employer cost | $159,300 | $166,734 |
| Annual uplift | , | +$7,434 |
Specialist Skills stream roles attract fewer regulatory restrictions, no labour market testing requirement and a more streamlined nomination process. The trade‑off is a significantly higher salary floor. Employers should weigh whether a given role genuinely meets the Specialist Skills criteria or whether the Core Skills stream (with its lower threshold but additional LMT obligation) is more appropriate.
One of the most common questions from employers preparing for the 2026 changes is whether they can still hire overseas staff from Australia and sponsor offshore candidates. The short answer is yes, but the practical calculus has shifted.
Onshore candidates (those already in Australia on a student visa, working holiday visa or bridging visa) can be nominated and may begin work as soon as a bridging visa with work rights is granted. Processing times for onshore nominations are generally shorter because health and character checks may already be on file. The likely practical effect of the 2026 reforms is to make onshore candidates marginally more attractive, since employers can fill roles faster and avoid the additional cost and delay of offshore visa processing.
Offshore candidates remain a viable option, particularly for specialist roles where the local talent pool is thin. However, employers should factor in visa processing timelines, the Department of Home Affairs publishes indicative processing times on its website, and build a buffer of at least three to four months between lodging the nomination and the intended start date. For regional employers using the Subclass 494 pathway, offshore candidates may benefit from priority processing under designated area migration agreements, though this varies by region.
Early indications suggest that employers who maintain a pipeline of both onshore and offshore candidates will be best positioned to adapt to processing delays or policy adjustments. Maintaining a current immigration lawyer relationship is strongly advisable for time‑sensitive hires.
The 2026 reforms do not merely raise the cost of sponsoring, they also raise the stakes for non‑compliance. The Department of Home Affairs has signalled increased resourcing for compliance monitoring, including data‑matching between STP payroll data and nomination records. The likely practical effect is that salary underpayment, previously detected primarily through worker complaints, will increasingly be identified through automated audits.
| Obligation | Required action | Penalty for non‑compliance |
|---|---|---|
| Pay the sponsored worker at least the TSMIT and market salary rate | Maintain payroll evidence for each pay cycle; reconcile annually | Civil penalty of up to 240 penalty units per contravention (currently over $80,000); potential barring from the Approved Work Sponsor register |
| Report material changes within 28 days | Notify the Department via ImmiAccount of any change to role, salary, hours or location | Infringement notice; possible cancellation of the sponsorship approval |
| Maintain records for five years | Store all nomination, contract, payslip and LMT documents securely | Adverse audit finding; potential civil penalty and inability to nominate new workers |
| Cooperate with compliance audits | Provide requested documents within the timeframe specified in the monitoring notice | Civil penalty; referral for further investigation |
| Pay reasonable travel costs if the sponsored worker departs | Budget for return airfare and reasonable relocation expenses | Civil penalty and possible recovery action by the Department |
The most effective risk‑mitigation strategy is a robust internal compliance calendar that schedules quarterly salary reconciliations, annual LMT reviews, and visa expiry tracking. Employers with more than five sponsored workers should consider engaging an external compliance advisor or migration agent to conduct an annual mock audit.
Preparation is best broken into three phases to avoid bottlenecks in HR, finance and legal simultaneously.
A nomination readiness checklist (spreadsheet format) and a sample employer budgeting calculator are available as companion resources. These tools map directly to the checklist items above and are designed to be used by non‑specialist HR staff.
The 1 July 2026 reforms reshape the landscape for employer sponsored visas in Australia in ways that demand immediate, practical action from every business that relies on overseas talent. The new Approved Work Sponsor register, higher salary floors and intensified enforcement are not optional adjustments, they are binding legal obligations with significant financial penalties for non‑compliance. Employers that act now to audit their nominations, recalibrate salaries and secure their place on the register will be best positioned to hire overseas staff in Australia without disruption. Those that delay risk nomination refusals, workforce gaps and regulatory sanctions.
Use the sponsor compliance checklist and worked examples in this guide as your starting point, and engage a qualified immigration lawyer through the Global Law Experts lawyer directory for advice tailored to your specific circumstances.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Maggie Taaffe at AHWC Immigration Law, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 2 minutes ago
posted 25 minutes ago
posted 47 minutes ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Advisory Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message