Our Expert in Malaysia
No results available
Last updated: 16 May 2026
The most significant set of trademark changes Malaysia has seen since the Trademarks Act 2019 (Act 815) came into force took effect on 1 February 2026 with the publication of the Guidelines of Trademarks 2019 (Version Amendment 1‑2026), widely referred to as VA1‑2026. These updated MyIPO guidelines tighten representation requirements for trademark agents, raise the evidentiary bar for applications and renewals, introduce stricter procedural timelines for prosecution, and impose additional documentary checks on transfers and recordals. For SME owners, in‑house counsel and brand agencies across Malaysia, the practical impact is immediate: existing filing, renewal and enforcement workflows must be reviewed and updated to avoid rejections, missed deadlines and potential penalties.
Before diving into the detail, every trademark holder and agent in Malaysia should work through the following compliance steps as a priority:
This article provides general compliance guidance on the trademark changes Malaysia introduced through VA1‑2026. It is not a substitute for advice from a MyIPO‑registered trademark agent familiar with the specific circumstances of your portfolio.
VA1‑2026 is an amendment to the Guidelines of Trademarks 2019, which serve as the primary procedural manual for the Intellectual Property Corporation of Malaysia (MyIPO). While the Trademarks Act 2019 (Act 815) and the Trademarks Regulations 2019 remain the governing legislation, the MyIPO guidelines dictate day‑to‑day examination practice, evidence standards and administrative procedures. Industry observers note that VA1‑2026 represents MyIPO’s effort to bring examination standards closer to international best practice, particularly following Malaysia’s accession to the Madrid Protocol.
The changes draw authority from several provisions of Act 815, including the sections governing the Register and registration process, the provisions on agents and representation, and the statutory framework for assignments and transmissions. The Trademarks Regulations 2019, particularly the regulations dealing with prescribed forms, fees and procedural time limits, provide the subsidiary framework that VA1‑2026 operationalises with greater specificity.
| Change Area | Pre‑VA1 Position | VA1‑2026 (Effective 1 February 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Agent representation evidence | Loose form of power of attorney; inconsistent identity checks across filings | MyIPO now requires a specified signed agent mandate form accompanied by identity verification documents and additional documentary proof as listed in VA1‑2026 |
| Evidence of use at examination | Flexible evidence standard; examiners accepted a wide range of informal proof | Stricter evidentiary list: date‑stamped photographs, sales invoices, packaging samples and advertising materials must follow VA1‑2026 format requirements |
| Prosecution timelines | Generous response windows with frequent extensions granted informally | Tighter deadlines for responding to examination reports; reduced discretion for extensions |
| Transfer and recordal | Largely administrative process with minimal supporting documents | Additional procedural checks, enhanced documentary requirements, and court confirmation needed in specific disputed cases |
| Electronic filing standards | Accepted but inconsistently enforced format specifications | Standardised digital file formats, naming conventions and resolution requirements for specimen uploads |
The practical effect of these changes is that applicants and registered owners who previously relied on minimal documentation will now need to invest in proper record‑keeping from the outset of any trademark matter.
Under Act 815, a foreign applicant filing a trademark in Malaysia must appoint a registered trademark agent to act on its behalf. Domestic applicants may file directly but frequently engage agents for prosecution efficiency. VA1‑2026 significantly expands the obligations placed on trademark agents Malaysia‑wide, making agent selection and ongoing compliance a critical concern for brand owners.
VA1‑2026 introduces a prescribed format for the agent mandate letter. Key requirements that businesses should confirm include:
When a business changes its trademark agent, VA1‑2026 clarifies that the outgoing agent must transfer the complete client file, including original mandate letters, prosecution correspondence, evidence bundles and renewal records, within a prescribed period. Businesses should request written confirmation of file transfer and conduct an independent audit of the received documents against MyIPO’s online records.
MyIPO retains the power to audit agent records and request evidence of compliance. Early indications suggest that non‑compliant mandate letters may result in applications being treated as abandoned, while repeated failures could trigger disciplinary proceedings against the agent’s registration. The likely practical effect for businesses is that they should verify agent compliance proactively rather than waiting for a MyIPO audit request.
| Agent Audit Item | Who Is Responsible | Recommended Deadline |
|---|---|---|
| Confirm mandate letter matches VA1‑2026 format | Trademark agent | Immediate, by 28 February 2026 |
| Collect and file identity verification documents | Trademark agent (with cooperation from principal) | Within 30 days of mandate execution |
| Audit active marks against MyIPO records | Business / in‑house counsel | Quarterly review recommended |
| Update agent on any corporate changes (name, address, merger) | Business / in‑house counsel | Within 14 days of change |
| Confirm file transfer completeness on agent change | New agent and business jointly | Within 30 days of new appointment |
The process to register a trademark in Malaysia under VA1‑2026 follows the same statutory stages established by Act 815, application, examination, publication, and registration, but the evidentiary and procedural requirements at each stage have been sharpened. The following checklist reflects the updated MyIPO guidelines.
Before submitting an application, businesses should:
Where an applicant claims prior use in Malaysia, VA1‑2026 requires a structured evidence pack. The following items are now considered essential:
For applicants claiming convention priority under the Paris Convention or filing via the Madrid Protocol, MyIPO expects certified copies of the priority document and, where applicable, a verified translation into Bahasa Malaysia or English. Industry observers expect examiners to scrutinise priority claims more closely under VA1‑2026 than under the previous guideline version.
If an examiner raises an objection, whether on absolute grounds (distinctiveness, descriptiveness) or relative grounds (conflict with earlier marks), the applicant must file a counter‑statement within the prescribed timeline. VA1‑2026 tightens the window for responses and reduces the Registrar’s discretion to grant extensions. Responses should:
The official fee structure under the Trademarks Regulations 2019 remains the primary reference point for calculating costs. The table below summarises the key fees applicable when filing an application to register a trademark in Malaysia:
| Fee Item | Official MyIPO Fee (per class) | Typical Agent Fee Range |
|---|---|---|
| Application filing (electronic) | Set by Trademarks Regulations 2019 fee schedule | RM 1,500 – RM 3,500 (varies by complexity) |
| Application filing (manual) | Higher rate per Regulations schedule | RM 2,000 – RM 4,000 |
| Response to examiner objection | No separate official fee in most cases | RM 1,000 – RM 3,000 per response |
| Registration (upon acceptance) | Per Regulations schedule | Included in many agent retainers |
Agent fees vary significantly depending on the complexity of the mark, the number of classes and whether prosecution involves objections or oppositions. Businesses should request a written fee estimate before engagement and confirm whether the quote covers VA1‑2026 compliance tasks such as evidence gathering and mandate letter preparation.
A registered trademark in Malaysia is valid for 10 years from the date of application and is renewable for successive 10‑year periods, as provided by Act 815. VA1‑2026 introduces additional procedural requirements that affect the renewal process and make early preparation more important than ever.
| Renewal Action | Official MyIPO Fee | Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Standard renewal (per class) | Per Regulations fee schedule | Before 10‑year expiry date |
| Late renewal surcharge | Additional surcharge per Regulations | During statutory grace period |
| Restoration after removal | Higher prescribed fee | Application within prescribed window |
The key takeaway for trademark renewal in Malaysia under VA1‑2026 is that early preparation, particularly around evidence of use, is no longer optional. Businesses that wait until the final weeks before expiry risk incomplete filings and potential lapses in protection.
Act 815 allows the assignment or transmission of a registered trademark, with or without the goodwill of the business. VA1‑2026 introduces enhanced procedural requirements for recording these changes with MyIPO, making it essential to plan any trademark transfer in Malaysia well in advance of completion.
The most common pitfall in trademark transfer matters is the failure to update the agent appointment simultaneously. Under VA1‑2026, a recordal filed without a corresponding new agent mandate letter (where the new owner uses a different agent) is likely to be queried, causing delays.
Protecting a registered trademark requires more than registration, it demands a clear enforcement strategy. VA1‑2026 reinforces the importance of maintaining robust evidence packs, which are essential whether pursuing administrative remedies, civil litigation or criminal prosecution for trademark enforcement in Malaysia.
When seeking an interim injunction from the Malaysian courts, the applicant must demonstrate a serious question to be tried, that damages would not be an adequate remedy, and that the balance of convenience favours granting relief. Under VA1‑2026, the evidence presented should include:
For regular civil claims, infringement actions, passing off or claims for delivery up, the same evidence categories apply, but the burden at trial is full proof on the balance of probabilities rather than the lower threshold for interlocutory applications.
Act 815 and the related Trade Descriptions Act provide criminal offences for counterfeiting and the use of false trade descriptions. The Ministry of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living (KPDN) is the primary enforcement agency. Early indications suggest that VA1‑2026’s emphasis on standardised evidence formats will also influence how trademark owners prepare complaints to KPDN, since officials increasingly expect the same documentary rigour seen in MyIPO prosecution files.
For Malaysian businesses with international registrations via the Madrid Protocol, VA1‑2026 does not directly alter the WIPO filing process. However, the enhanced evidence standards now apply when relying on a Malaysian base registration to support an international application, or when defending a Malaysian designation against cancellation. Maintaining VA1‑2026‑compliant evidence of use in Malaysia is therefore critical for international portfolio integrity.
| Scenario | Recommended Action | Evidence Needed |
|---|---|---|
| Small‑scale local infringer, first offence | Cease‑and‑desist letter with settlement offer | Registration extract, evidence of use, screenshots of infringement |
| Persistent infringer ignoring C&D | Civil suit for injunction and damages | Full evidence pack (VA1‑2026 compliant), financial loss records, customer confusion evidence |
| Large‑scale counterfeiting operation | Criminal complaint to KPDN + civil suit | All of the above plus market survey, investigator reports, purchase samples |
| Cross‑border online infringement | Platform takedown + civil action if unsuccessful | Registration extract, platform‑specific evidence (URLs, timestamps), WIPO/Madrid documentation if applicable |
Trademark registration alone is not sufficient to deter infringers, it is the readiness of your evidence pack and the speed of your response that ultimately protect brand value.
To assist businesses and trademark agents in implementing the VA1‑2026 requirements, the following template resources should be prepared and kept current:
When saving evidence files, use a consistent naming convention that includes the mark name, document type, and the date in YYYY‑MM‑DD format. This practice ensures that MyIPO examiners and courts can quickly identify and verify the relevance of each document.
The trademark changes Malaysia introduced through VA1‑2026 are not merely administrative updates, they represent a fundamental tightening of the standards that MyIPO applies across every stage of the trademark lifecycle, from initial filing through to enforcement. Businesses that treat compliance as a one‑off task risk costly rejections and gaps in brand protection. The most effective response is to implement a systematic review of your existing portfolio, engage a registered MyIPO trademark agent, and build the evidence‑gathering and record‑keeping practices that VA1‑2026 now demands into your ongoing operations.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Parvathi Kandasamy at MESSRS K.SILADASS & PARTNERS, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 27 seconds ago
posted 22 minutes ago
posted 44 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Advisory Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message