Our Expert in Philippines
No results available
The Philippines is in the middle of a decisive policy window for technology companies and the investors who back them. The convergence of the CREATE MORE Act’s expanded tax incentives, updated foreign-ownership rules under the 13th Foreign Investment Negative List (FINL), and tightened SEC General Information Sheet (GIS) and beneficial-ownership disclosure requirements means that tech company structuring Philippines decisions made in 2026 will lock in, or forfeit, significant advantages for years to come. Whether a founder is launching a SaaS platform from Makati, a venture fund is deploying capital into a Philippine AI startup, or a multinational is setting up a shared-services centre, the structuring playbook has changed.
This guide walks through every layer, entity selection, ownership caps, incentive qualification, SEC and BSP compliance, so that decision-makers can act with precision before the window narrows further.
TL;DR, six decisions every founder and foreign investor must get right:
Three regulatory currents are running simultaneously, and their combined effect reshapes the landscape for startup market entry Philippines strategies. First, the CREATE MORE Act (Republic Act No. 12066) expanded and extended the fiscal incentives framework originally introduced by the CREATE Act (RA 11534), widening the menu of income tax holidays (ITH), special corporate income tax (SCIT) rates and enhanced deductions available to registered business enterprises. Second, ongoing ease of doing business Philippines reforms, driven by the EODB Act (RA 11032) and successive SEC and BOI digitisation mandates, have shortened registration timelines and introduced electronic filing for key corporate documents. Third, the 13th FINL, issued pursuant to Executive Order No.
113, rationalised sector-specific foreign-ownership caps, opening several technology-adjacent activities to higher or full foreign equity participation.
For tech founders and foreign investors, the practical effect is straightforward: the incentive upside is larger, the entry barriers are lower, and the compliance obligations are stricter. Getting the structure right at incorporation, rather than retrofitting later, is now the single highest-return legal decision a company can make.
| Date | Event | Practical Effect |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | CREATE Act (RA 11534) took effect | Reduced regular CIT to 25 %; introduced rationalised incentives via FIRB/BOI |
| 2023 | Executive Order No. 113, 13th FINL issued | Opened additional sectors to foreign ownership; tightened negative list to three explicit categories |
| 2024 | CREATE MORE Act (RA 12066) signed | Expanded ITH periods, enhanced deductions and VAT incentives for registered enterprises |
| 2025–2026 | SEC digitisation of GIS / beneficial-ownership filings; BOI updated SIPP | Electronic GIS filing mandatory; new beneficial-ownership fields; updated Strategic Investment Priority Plan (SIPP) listing tech activities |
The entity a tech company selects determines its tax treatment, incentive eligibility, fundraising flexibility and regulatory burden. Philippine law offers several vehicles, but three are used by the vast majority of technology ventures entering the market.
A Philippine domestic corporation, organised and registered with the SEC under the Revised Corporation Code (RA 11232), is the default choice for tech startups that intend to raise equity capital locally or internationally, hire a Philippine workforce, and apply for CREATE MORE incentives. It may be up to 100 % foreign-owned where the activity falls outside the Negative List. Minimum paid-up capital requirements depend on the applicable foreign-investment thresholds.
A branch office is an extension of a foreign corporation licensed to do business in the Philippines. It can generate revenue and enter into contracts, but it is not a separate juridical entity. Branches are subject to Philippine CIT on income derived from Philippine sources and must obtain an SEC licence. They are generally eligible to apply for BOI incentives, although the application pathway differs from that of a domestic corporation.
A representative office is limited to liaison, quality-control and information-dissemination activities. It cannot derive income from the Philippines and must be fully funded by remittances from its head office. A REP is rarely the right vehicle for a tech startup intending to sell products or services in-market, but it can serve as a low-cost entry point for market research ahead of full incorporation.
| Entity Type | Fundraising Suitability | CREATE MORE Incentives Eligibility |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic corporation | High, can issue multiple share classes, accept local and foreign equity | Yes, primary vehicle for BOI/PEZA registration |
| Branch office | Limited, capitalised by head-office assignment; no local share issuance | Conditional, may register but process is more complex |
| Representative office | None, cannot generate Philippine-source income | No, does not conduct qualifying revenue-generating activities |
For most tech startups targeting CREATE MORE incentives and planning to raise venture capital, a domestic stock corporation incorporated under the Revised Corporation Code will be the strongest foundation.
The question of how much equity a foreign investor can hold is governed primarily by the Constitution, the Foreign Investments Act (RA 7042, as amended) and the regularly updated Foreign Investment Negative List. Understanding the current foreign ownership rules Philippines framework is essential before any structuring decision is finalised.
The Philippine Constitution reserves certain activities and resources to Filipino citizens or to corporations that are at least 60 % Filipino-owned. This so-called “60/40 rule” applies to sectors explicitly enumerated in the Constitution, including land ownership, mass media, public utilities (as amended by RA 11659) and the exploitation of natural resources. Crucially, the rule does not apply to all business activities. Technology companies engaged in software development, SaaS, AI, data analytics or IT-enabled services generally fall outside these constitutional restrictions and can be structured with up to 100 % foreign equity.
Executive Order No. 113 promulgated the 13th Foreign Investment Negative List, which consolidated the restricted sectors into three lists: List A (foreign-ownership limited by the Constitution or specific laws), List B (defence, risk to public safety and small-scale enterprises with paid-in capital below a certain threshold) and List C (activities covered by existing law with specific foreign-ownership limits). Activities that do not appear on any list are open to 100 % foreign ownership.
While most pure-play tech activities are unrestricted, founders should watch for crossover situations: a fintech company that operates a lending platform may trigger BSP or SEC licensing requirements that carry their own ownership conditions; a company providing telecommunications infrastructure services may fall under the Public Service Act’s foreign-ownership limits (now at 100 % for non-public-utility telecoms services under RA 11659); and any enterprise that needs to own land must comply with the 60/40 constitutional cap.
Where a cap applies, common structuring solutions include issuing non-voting preferred shares to foreign investors (preserving economic interest while keeping voting control with Filipino shareholders), entering joint ventures with local partners, or securing a special investor’s resident visa and registering with the BOI to avail of treaty-based protections.
| Shareholder | Common Shares (Voting) | Preferred Shares (Non-Voting) | Economic Interest |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filipino founder(s) | 60 % | 0 % | 30 % |
| Foreign VC fund | 40 % | 100 % | 70 % |
| Total | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % |
This structure satisfies the 60/40 voting requirement while allowing the foreign investor to capture majority economics through preferred-share dividend and liquidation rights. It should be reviewed carefully with Philippine counsel to ensure compliance with SEC and BOI anti-dummy provisions.
The CREATE MORE Act significantly enhanced the fiscal-incentive toolkit available to registered business enterprises (RBEs). For tech startups, the law, together with the Strategic Investment Priority Plan (SIPP) issued by the Fiscal Incentives Review Board (FIRB) and administered principally by the BOI, creates a structured pathway to reduced or zero corporate income tax, enhanced deductions and VAT-related benefits. Navigating the create more incentives framework requires mapping your specific activities to the SIPP, selecting the right investment promotion agency (IPA) and assembling the documentary package before filing.
The SIPP identifies priority activities rather than sectors. Technology companies typically qualify under tiers covering innovation and R&D-intensive activities, IT-BPM (information technology and business process management), knowledge-based services and highly technical manufacturing. The key question is whether the company’s principal revenue-generating activity, not just its product category, matches a SIPP-listed activity.
| Incentive | What It Covers | Typical Eligibility for Tech |
|---|---|---|
| Income Tax Holiday (ITH) | 0 % CIT on income from registered activity for 4–7 years | High, available for pioneer and innovation-driven projects |
| Special Corporate Income Tax (SCIT) | 5 % CIT on gross income earned after ITH period | High, commonly follows ITH for BOI-registered tech |
| Enhanced Deductions (ED) | Up to 150 % deduction on qualifying expenses (R&D, training, infrastructure) | High, especially valuable for AI/ML R&D-heavy startups |
| VAT exemption / zero-rating | VAT exemption on local purchases of goods and services; zero-rated VAT on export sales | Conditional, depends on export-revenue proportion and IPA registration |
| Duty exemption on imported capital equipment | 0 % customs duty on equipment directly used in registered activity | Moderate, relevant for data-centre and hardware-intensive tech |
Example 1, SaaS startup with a local development team. A Singapore-incorporated company sets up a 100 %-foreign-owned Philippine domestic subsidiary to house 50 software engineers building a B2B SaaS platform. Revenue is generated by subscriptions from clients across Southeast Asia. The subsidiary registers with the BOI under the IT-BPM / innovation tier, receives a four-year ITH followed by SCIT, and claims enhanced deductions on developer-training expenditure. Because the activity is not on the Negative List, no ownership restriction applies.
Example 2, AI marketplace with integrated payments. A Philippine-founded startup builds an AI-powered logistics marketplace that processes payments through a third-party payment facilitator. The company incorporates as a domestic corporation with 70 % Filipino and 30 % foreign equity (anticipating future VC rounds). It registers with the BOI under the innovation-driven tier. Because it does not itself hold a BSP-issued electronic money issuer or operator of payment system licence, it avoids the additional ownership conditions attached to regulated financial activities, but it must monitor whether its model evolves into a regulated service.
The SEC’s General Information Sheet is the single most important annual corporate filing in the Philippines. Since 2025, the SEC has expanded the sec gis beneficial ownership disclosure requirements and moved to mandatory electronic submission. Missing or inaccurate filings can trigger penalties, block incentive applications and, in serious cases, lead to revocation of the certificate of incorporation.
The GIS is an annual disclosure document that provides the SEC with a snapshot of a corporation’s directors, officers, stockholders, principal business address and, critically, its beneficial owners. Every domestic corporation registered with the SEC must file a GIS within 30 calendar days from the date of its annual stockholders’ meeting. Branch offices and representative offices of foreign corporations licensed by the SEC must also file equivalent annual reports. For a detailed walkthrough, see our guide to the SEC GIS form requirements for 2026.
The beneficial-ownership section of the GIS requires disclosure of every natural person who ultimately owns or controls 25 % or more of the corporation’s shares, or who otherwise exercises ultimate effective control. Required data points include the beneficial owner’s full legal name, nationality, date of birth, residential address, tax identification number (TIN), percentage and nature of beneficial ownership, and the date on which the interest was acquired. Common errors that trigger SEC queries include failing to look through nominee and corporate shareholders, omitting indirect ownership chains and listing a corporate entity, rather than a natural person, as the beneficial owner.
| Entity Type | SEC GIS Filing Required? | Eligible for CREATE MORE Incentives? |
|---|---|---|
| Domestic corporation | Yes, annually, within 30 days of stockholders’ meeting | Yes, primary vehicle for BOI/PEZA registration |
| Branch office | Yes, annual report equivalent required | Conditional, may register but process is more complex |
| Representative office | Yes, annual report required | No, does not conduct qualifying revenue-generating activities |
Penalties for late or non-filing include daily surcharges, and repeated non-compliance can result in the SEC placing the corporation under delinquent status, effectively suspending its ability to operate. For foreign-owned entities, this also jeopardises the BSP-registered status of inbound investment. See also the SEC beneficial-ownership declaration guide and the foreign-ownership requirements overview for deeper treatment of each issue.
Every foreign investor who wants the legal right to repatriate dividends, profits and capital from the Philippines in foreign currency must register the inbound investment with the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas. The bsp foreign investment registration process is administrative but non-negotiable, without it, outbound FX remittances must be sourced from the investor’s own foreign-currency accounts or purchased on the open market, and repatriation rights are not guaranteed.
BSP registration through an authorised agent bank is required for: (a) inbound equity investments in Philippine corporations or partnerships, (b) foreign-currency loans extended to Philippine borrowers and (c) any investment where the investor intends to repatriate capital, dividends or loan repayments through the Philippine banking system in foreign currency.
Industry observers expect processing to take approximately two to four weeks from complete submission, although timelines vary by bank and transaction complexity. For a practical overview of opening corporate bank accounts in the Philippines, see the linked guide.
Structuring part of the inbound investment as a shareholder loan, rather than pure equity, can create interest-deduction benefits for the Philippine subsidiary and allows periodic principal repayments. However, thin-capitalisation rules under the Tax Code (and potential BIR scrutiny of related-party loans) mean the debt-to-equity ratio must be commercially reasonable. Interest payments to non-resident lenders are generally subject to withholding tax, which may be reduced under an applicable tax treaty.
Once the entity is operational, a disciplined compliance calendar prevents costly penalties and preserves incentive eligibility. The key tax incentives Philippines framework under CREATE MORE requires that RBEs maintain their registered status by meeting employment, investment and reporting conditions, failure to comply can trigger incentive withdrawal.
| Filing | Frequency | Responsible Party |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly VAT return (BIR Form 2550M) | Monthly, due 20th of the following month | Finance / tax team |
| Quarterly VAT return (BIR Form 2550Q) | Quarterly, due 25th of the month following the quarter | Finance / tax team |
| Expanded withholding tax return (BIR Form 0619-E / 1601-EQ) | Monthly remittance; quarterly return | Finance / tax team |
| Annual income tax return (BIR Form 1702) | Annually, due 15th of the 4th month after fiscal year-end | Finance / external auditor |
| SEC GIS and audited financial statements | Annually, within 30 days of stockholders’ meeting (GIS); 120 days from fiscal year-end (AFS) | Corporate secretary / external auditor |
| Transfer-pricing documentation (BIR) | Prepared annually; submitted upon BIR request or with the annual return | Tax team / transfer-pricing adviser |
| BOI/IPA annual compliance report | Annually, as required by the IPA’s registration terms | Legal / compliance |
Cross-border IP licensing arrangements, common in tech, require careful pricing. Royalty payments to non-resident licensors are subject to Philippine withholding tax (typically 25 %, reducible under a tax treaty). Transfer-pricing documentation must demonstrate arm’s-length pricing, and the BIR has become increasingly active in auditing related-party transactions involving intangibles.
The following timeline assumes a foreign-invested domestic corporation targeting BOI registration for CREATE MORE incentives. Adjust sequencing based on entity type and IPA.
Red flags that delay incentives:
Tech company structuring Philippines decisions in 2026 sit at the intersection of opportunity and obligation. The CREATE MORE Act has made the incentive regime more generous than at any point in the past decade, the 13th FINL has removed barriers for most technology activities, and the SEC’s digitised GIS and beneficial-ownership framework demands rigour from every registered entity. Founders and foreign investors who align their entity selection, ownership structure and compliance calendar with these reforms will secure measurable tax savings, protect repatriation rights and avoid the enforcement actions that are increasingly common as regulators digitise their monitoring. Those who delay risk losing incentive eligibility or, worse, operating in a structurally non-compliant state that is costly to unwind.
For specific structuring advice, readers are encouraged to find a Philippines business lawyer through the Global Law Experts directory.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Joseph James Joaquino Jr at AJA Law (Alcantara Joaquino Alcantara Law), a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 15 minutes ago
posted 38 minutes ago
posted 40 minutes ago
posted 40 minutes ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 5 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Advisory Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message