Our Expert in Germany
No results available
Last updated May 21, 2026, includes 2026 tax and merger-control updates.
How do you sell a company in Germany? You choose a deal form, share deal or asset deal, prepare the business for sale, negotiate commercial terms with a qualified buyer and manage the tax, regulatory and liability clearances that German law requires. For a typical mid-market transaction, the company sale process in Germany runs between three and nine months from preparation to closing. In 2026, renewed cross-border buyer interest and a recovering European M&A market are giving German SME owners improved exit opportunities, but recent developments in merger-control enforcement, ongoing Pillar Two implementation, and the expanded scope of the Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz, LkSG) mean that sellers must plan earlier and more carefully than in previous cycles.
This guide is a practical, seller-focused playbook. It walks company owners through every phase, from choosing between a share deal and an asset deal, through tax planning and seller due diligence, to merger-control filings, SPA negotiation and post-closing obligations. Whether you are a founder selling a GmbH to a private-equity fund, a family transferring a generational Mittelstand business, or a corporate group divesting a subsidiary to a foreign strategic buyer, the framework below will help you protect value and minimise risk.
The company sale process in Germany typically follows eight stages. Timelines vary by deal size and complexity, but the ranges below reflect mid-market experience.
Industry observers expect that well-prepared mid-market transactions closing in 2026 will complete in roughly five to seven months. Complex cross-border deals or those requiring Bundeskartellamt clearance typically add four to eight weeks.
The single most consequential decision when selling a business in Germany is whether to structure the transaction as a share deal or an asset deal. Each form produces different tax outcomes, liability profiles and practical complexities. Understanding the share deal vs asset deal Germany pros and cons is essential before engaging with any buyer.
In a share deal the shareholders transfer their shares in the company (typically a GmbH or AG) to the buyer. The company itself, with all its assets, contracts, employees, liabilities and permits, stays intact. Ownership changes at the shareholder level; nothing moves at the entity level. A share deal is the most common structure for German mid-market M&A because it is operationally simpler and, for many sellers, more tax-efficient.
In an asset deal the company sells individual assets, equipment, real estate, IP, customer contracts, inventory, and the buyer may also assume specified liabilities. The seller retains the legal entity (the corporate “shell”) after the transaction. Asset deals allow the buyer to cherry-pick assets and step up their tax base, but they create complexity around contract transfers, employee-transfer rules under Section 613a of the German Civil Code (BGB), and VAT treatment.
| Feature | Share Deal | Asset Deal |
|---|---|---|
| Who transfers ownership | Shareholders transfer company shares; entity remains intact | Company sells assets and liabilities; buyer may cherry-pick assets |
| Seller tax outcome (typical) | Capital gain on shares for seller, tax treatment depends on seller type and available exemptions (e.g., 40% partial-income method for individuals, 95% exemption for corporate sellers) | Taxable profit at seller company level; potential VAT and income tax consequences at both entity and shareholder levels |
| Seller liability post-closing | Generally lower, liabilities remain with the company (though warranties and indemnities in the SPA still apply) | Potentially higher, buyer may require seller indemnities for transferred liabilities; Section 75 of the German Tax Code (AO) can impose buyer liability for seller’s tax debts |
| Operational complexity | Lower, contracts, permits and employees transfer automatically with the entity | Higher, individual asset transfers may need counterparty consent; employees transfer by operation of law under BGB Section 613a but must be notified |
| Real estate transfer tax (Grunderwerbsteuer) | May be triggered at rates of 3.5%–6.5% (depending on federal state) if share-deal thresholds are met | Triggered directly on real estate assets included in the sale |
| Purchase-price step-up for buyer | No step-up, buyer inherits book values | Full step-up, buyer can depreciate assets at fair market value, creating future tax savings |
From the seller’s perspective, the critical legal difference is liability exposure. In a share deal, the buyer acquires the entity “as is”, all hidden liabilities transfer inside the company. The seller’s exposure is capped by the reps, warranties and indemnities negotiated in the SPA. In an asset deal, the seller must separately identify every asset and liability to be transferred, and the contract must address each one. Failure to transfer a key contract (e.g., a customer framework agreement requiring counterparty consent) can reduce deal value.
Employment law is another important distinction. In a share deal, employees remain employed by the same entity, nothing changes. In an asset deal, Section 613a BGB mandates an automatic transfer of employees whose employment relationship is connected to the business unit being sold. Employees must be notified and have a one-month objection right. Mishandled employee notifications are a common source of post-closing disputes.
Consider a sole individual shareholder selling 100% of a GmbH at an enterprise value of €5 million. The shareholder originally paid €25,000 for the share capital.
This example illustrates why most individual sellers strongly prefer a share deal. Corporate sellers selling shares in a subsidiary can benefit from an even more favourable regime, the 95% participation exemption under Section 8b of the Corporation Tax Act (KStG).
The tax implications of a company sale in Germany depend on two variables: the deal form (share vs asset) and the seller’s legal status (individual vs corporate). Careful planning before signing a letter of intent can save hundreds of thousands of euros.
For individual sellers, capital gains on shares in a GmbH or AG held as business assets are subject to the partial-income method. Sixty per cent of the gain is added to taxable income and taxed at the seller’s marginal income tax rate (14–45%) plus 5.5% solidarity surcharge on the tax itself. Shares held as private assets (non-business) are normally subject to the flat-rate withholding tax (Abgeltungsteuer) of 25% plus solidarity surcharge, though holdings of 1% or more in a corporation fall back into the partial-income method.
For corporate sellers (e.g., a GmbH holding company selling shares in a subsidiary), 95% of the capital gain is effectively tax-exempt under Section 8b KStG. Only 5% of the gain is treated as non-deductible business expenses, producing an effective tax rate of roughly 1.5% on the total gain. This makes structuring ownership through a holding company one of the most powerful pre-sale tax planning tools in German M&A.
If the seller entity is itself a German corporation, trade tax (Gewerbesteuer) applies to its business profits. The combined rate of corporation tax (15%) plus solidarity surcharge (0.825%) plus trade tax (typically 14–17%) produces a total effective corporate tax rate of roughly 30–33%. However, the Section 8b KStG exemption means that gains from share disposals escape this burden almost entirely. Asset-deal gains, by contrast, are fully exposed to the combined rate.
Sellers who are natural persons can benefit from the trade-tax credit under Section 35 of the Income Tax Act (EStG), which partially offsets trade tax against personal income tax, but the relief is limited and rarely eliminates the full trade-tax burden on asset-sale profits.
An asset deal generates taxable profit at the company level. The gain, calculated as the difference between the purchase price allocated to each asset and its book value, is subject to corporation tax and trade tax. The seller company must then distribute the after-tax proceeds to its shareholders, triggering a second layer of taxation (dividend or liquidation-distribution tax).
VAT is another consideration. The transfer of an entire business as a going concern (Geschäftsveräußerung im Ganzen) is generally VAT-exempt under Section 1(1a) of the German VAT Act (UStG). If only selected assets are sold, standard VAT rules apply to each asset individually. Careful structuring of the asset perimeter is essential to avoid unnecessary VAT exposure.
When the buyer or seller is a non-resident, cross-border m&a Germany tax rules come into play. Germany maintains an extensive network of double tax treaties (DTTs). Under most German DTTs, capital gains on shares are taxable only in the seller’s country of residence, not in Germany, unless the company derives more than 50% of its value from German real estate. In that case, Germany may retain taxing rights under the real-estate clause.
Sellers should verify whether withholding obligations arise (particularly on deemed distributions or asset-sale proceeds paid to foreign entities) by consulting the Bundeszentralamt für Steuern (BZSt). Planning tip: if a foreign seller holds shares through a German holding company, the Section 8b KStG exemption can still be accessed, but substance requirements must be met to avoid anti-avoidance challenges.
Buyer due diligence attracts all the attention, but seller due diligence is where deals are saved, or lost. A seller due diligence checklist for Germany should be assembled at least eight to twelve weeks before engaging buyers. The purpose is to identify deal-breakers before the buyer does, clean up solvable problems and prepare disclosure documents that minimise post-closing warranty claims.
The following categories form the core of a robust seller due diligence exercise:
Common red flags that delay or kill deals include undisclosed tax-audit risks, unresolved environmental contamination, key-customer contracts with change-of-control termination rights, and pension under-funding. Identify and resolve these before entering the data room.
Not every company sale triggers a merger-control filing, but failing to file when required can result in the transaction being unwound. The Bundeskartellamt (German Federal Cartel Office) must be notified before closing if the following domestic-turnover thresholds under Section 35 of the Act against Restraints of Competition (GWB) are met:
An additional transaction-value threshold applies where the transaction value exceeds €400 million and the target has substantial domestic activities in Germany, even if it has not yet generated significant turnover. This is designed to capture acquisitions of high-value start-ups.
The standard review period (Phase I) is one month from complete filing. If the Bundeskartellamt opens an in-depth review (Phase II), the total period can extend to five months or more. Pre-notification contact with the authority is strongly recommended for complex transactions. Sellers should plan their signing-to-closing timeline around worst-case clearance periods and negotiate a “long-stop date” in the SPA that accommodates both Phase I and a possible Phase II review.
For transactions that also meet EU-level thresholds, the European Commission has exclusive jurisdiction. Additionally, Germany’s FDI-screening regime under the Foreign Trade and Payments Act (AWV) can require notification for acquisitions by non-EU buyers in sensitive sectors such as defence, critical infrastructure, health and advanced technology. The Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action (BMWK) reviews these cases, and clearance can take several months.
Cross-border m&a Germany transactions are increasingly common as private-equity funds and international strategic acquirers target the German Mittelstand. Sellers dealing with foreign buyers should anticipate several additional layers of complexity.
Where a share deal generates a capital gain for a non-resident seller, Germany generally does not impose withholding tax on the sale proceeds, provided the relevant DTT allocates taxing rights to the seller’s country of residence and the real-estate clause is not triggered. Sellers should confirm this position under the specific treaty in force between Germany and the buyer’s jurisdiction. The Bundeszentralamt für Steuern (BZSt) maintains a complete list of German DTTs and can issue advance-clearance certificates for withholding-tax purposes.
Foreign buyers commonly establish a German acquisition vehicle (a NewCo GmbH) to hold the target shares. Sellers should scrutinise the NewCo’s capitalisation, an under-capitalised buyer vehicle is a warranty-claim risk. Best practice is to require the buyer’s parent to guarantee the NewCo’s SPA obligations, or to insist on a meaningful escrow deposit (typically 10–20% of the purchase price held for 18–24 months).
Sellers should also consider warranty-and-indemnity (W&I) insurance, which has become standard market practice in German M&A. A buy-side W&I policy allows the seller to cap its liability at a fraction of the purchase price, often €1, while providing the buyer with recourse to the insurer.
Since recent AWV amendments, acquisitions of 10% or more voting rights in German companies active in specified sectors by non-EU/EFTA buyers trigger a mandatory FDI-screening filing. Industry observers expect continued enforcement emphasis in 2026, particularly for targets with dual-use technology, semiconductor capabilities or healthcare infrastructure. Sellers should factor screening timelines into the SPA conditions precedent.
The share purchase agreement (or asset purchase agreement) is where value is protected or eroded. Sellers entering negotiation should focus on the following priorities:
Closing is not the end of the seller’s obligations. The following post-closing steps apply to most German company sales:
Selling a company in Germany in 2026 demands careful planning across deal structure, tax, regulatory clearances and SPA negotiation. For most sellers, a share deal remains the most tax-efficient route, but the choice must be validated against the specific transaction’s facts, including the seller’s tax status, the target’s asset composition and the buyer’s preferences. Early preparation of a seller due diligence checklist, combined with informed decisions on merger-control timing and cross-border structuring, will protect the seller’s value and minimise post-closing surprises. If you are considering how do you sell a company effectively and are navigating the complexities of German M&A in 2026, engaging experienced legal counsel at the earliest stage remains the single most valuable step you can take.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Torsten Bergau at FRANKUS Wirtschaftsprufer Steuerberater Rechtsanwalte, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 18 minutes ago
posted 42 minutes ago
posted 45 minutes ago
posted 1 hour ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 2 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 3 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 4 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Advisory Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message