Our Expert in Zambia
No results available
Zambia’s Banking and Financial Services Act 2026 (Act No. 9 of 2026) represents the most far-reaching overhaul of the country’s financial-sector regulation in nearly a decade, consolidating oversight of banks, microfinance institutions, moneylenders, fintechs, and e-money issuers under a single Bank of Zambia (BOZ) supervisory framework. The Act replaces the fragmented patchwork of the former Banking and Financial Services Act 2017 and the Money-lenders Act, folding every entity that provides a “financial service”, as broadly defined in the new statute, into one licensing, reporting, and enforcement regime. For businesses operating in or entering the Zambian market, the compliance, tax, and licensing consequences are immediate and substantial.
This guide unpacks who is covered, what has changed, how licensing works, and what the Act means for tax planning, with a practical checklist and worked examples designed for compliance teams, lenders, and legal advisers.
Key takeaway: If your organisation lends money, issues electronic money, provides payment services, or facilitates credit in Zambia, you now fall, or will fall upon commencement, under direct Bank of Zambia supervision and must hold a licence issued under the Banking and Financial Services Act 2026.
The Act adopts intentionally broad definitions. A “financial service” encompasses the acceptance of deposits, lending, leasing, payment services, issuing and managing means of payment (including e-money), money transmission, and any other service that BOZ may prescribe by statutory instrument. A “financial service provider” is any person who provides or offers to provide a financial service, whether as a principal business or ancillary activity.
This language is critical because it does not limit coverage to traditional banks. Any entity whose operations touch lending, credit facilitation, or electronic payment falls within scope. The definition deliberately closes the regulatory gap that allowed informal moneylenders and digital-only lenders to operate without meaningful Bank of Zambia supervision under prior legislation.
Industry observers expect the following provider categories to feel the greatest impact from the 2026 changes:
The practical effect is clear: if an entity’s activity matches the statutory definition of a financial service, it requires a money lending licence in Zambia (or the equivalent BOZ authorisation) regardless of its historical classification.
The Act introduces a unified supervisory architecture that replaces the sector-specific approach of the 2017 Banking and Financial Services Act and the Money-lenders Act. The major legal shifts include a single-window licensing regime administered by BOZ, expanded ownership-and-control rules requiring prior BOZ approval for significant shareholding changes, strengthened anti-money-laundering and know-your-customer alignment, enhanced consumer-protection provisions (including mandatory credit-data sharing), and tougher criminal sanctions for unlicensed financial activity.
The comparison table below summarises how oversight has shifted for each major entity type. This pre-2026 versus post-2026 comparison illustrates the scope of the consolidation.
| Entity Type | Pre-2026 Oversight | Post-2026 Oversight (BFSA 2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial banks | BOZ supervision under the Banking and Financial Services Act 2017 | BOZ supervision continues; harmonised reporting templates and updated prudential standards apply |
| Microfinance institutions | Separate regulatory rules with variable supervisory depth | Explicitly captured under the BFSA 2026; full BOZ supervision, capital, and conduct requirements |
| Moneylenders / informal lenders | Money-lenders Act; limited prudential oversight | Classified as financial service providers; require BOZ licence; subject to all reporting and capital rules |
| Fintech / e-money issuers | Some coverage under payment-systems rules; variable and often unclear oversight | Brought under BOZ oversight with explicit licensing and prudential obligations |
| Credit-only lenders | Minimal or no regulation | Within BOZ remit; licensing, minimum capital, BOZ reporting obligations all apply |
For entities that previously fell outside or on the margins of regulation, the likely practical effect will be a significant increase in compliance cost, but also greater market credibility and access to formal payment and credit-reference infrastructure.
Under Zambia’s Banking and Financial Services Act 2026, no person may provide a financial service unless licensed by BOZ. The licensing process requires applicants to demonstrate that they meet fit-and-proper criteria for owners and directors, hold prescribed minimum capital, and maintain robust governance and risk-management frameworks.
Do moneylenders now need a BOZ licence? Yes. Under the 2026 Act, any person who lends money as a business, whether as a principal activity or ancillary service, is a financial service provider and must hold a licence. The former Money-lenders Act regime no longer serves as an alternative pathway. Existing moneylenders who continue to operate without applying for a BOZ licence face criminal prosecution and civil penalties.
The commencement date of the Banking and Financial Services Act 2026 is a critical planning variable. As of the date of this article (5 August 2026), the ZambiaLII consolidated entry for Act No. 9 of 2026 notes the Act as “uncommenced.” This means that while the Act has been passed by Parliament and assented to, its operative provisions have not yet been formally brought into force by a commencement order published in the Government Gazette.
Industry observers expect the commencement order to follow relatively promptly, given BOZ’s public statements about monitoring and compliance readiness. The recommended approach for affected entities is to treat the transitional period as a preparation window: begin assembling documentation, engaging legal and tax advisers, and preparing internal compliance frameworks so that a licensing application can be filed as soon as commencement is gazetted. Waiting for the commencement order before starting preparatory work creates unnecessary operational risk.
Once licensed, financial service providers face a materially expanded set of ongoing obligations under Zambia’s Banking and Financial Services Act 2026. These obligations apply across all entity categories, not only banks, and mark a significant uplift for non-bank providers that previously operated with limited supervisory engagement.
Periodic returns. Licensed providers will be required to submit periodic prudential returns to BOZ, covering capital adequacy, asset quality, liquidity positions, and exposure concentrations. The frequency and format of these returns will be prescribed by BOZ directives and statutory instruments.
Credit-data provision. BOZ has emphasised the importance of credit-data sharing and utilisation as a core feature of the new framework. Licensed providers will be expected to report borrower data to approved credit-reference bureaux and to query those databases before extending credit, strengthening the overall credit ecosystem.
AML/CFT and KYC compliance. The Act reinforces alignment with Zambia’s anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism-financing obligations. Every licensed provider must maintain up-to-date customer-identification and verification processes, file suspicious-transaction reports, and cooperate with the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC).
Conduct-of-business rules. Consumer-facing obligations include transparent disclosure of fees, interest rates, and loan terms before contract execution. Early indications suggest BOZ will issue detailed conduct-of-business guidelines covering advertising, complaints handling, and treatment of customers in financial difficulty.
Governance and internal controls. Boards of licensed providers must establish risk committees, internal-audit functions, and compliance-officer roles. These requirements, standard for banks, are now extended to microfinance institutions, digital lenders, and other non-bank providers under the harmonised framework.
The tax implications of the Banking and Financial Services Act 2026 are substantial, even though the Act itself is primarily a regulatory and supervisory statute rather than a tax measure. The practical consequences flow from how formalisation, licensing, and expanded BOZ reporting interact with Zambia’s existing tax framework administered by the Zambia Revenue Authority (ZRA). As of 5 August 2026, no official ZRA guidance specific to the 2026 Act has been published, entities should monitor ZRA communications and seek specialist tax advice.
Entities that previously operated informally or semi-formally, particularly moneylenders and credit-only lenders, will now be required to maintain audited financial statements and file corporate income-tax returns. Interest income earned from lending activities is subject to corporate income tax at the standard rate. For foreign fintech operators extending credit into Zambia through a digital platform, the critical question is whether their activities under the Act create a taxable presence (permanent establishment) in Zambia, triggering full corporate income-tax liability on Zambian-source profits.
Under Zambia’s Value Added Tax Act, the supply of financial services is generally exempt from VAT. However, “financial services” for VAT purposes has a specific statutory definition that does not necessarily mirror the broader definition in the 2026 Act. Certain ancillary charges, such as arrangement fees, advisory fees, debt-collection charges, and platform-access fees charged by fintech lenders, may fall outside the VAT exemption and be subject to VAT at the standard rate. The distinction between an exempt supply of credit and a taxable supply of a fee-based service requires careful analysis.
Worked example, VAT on a fintech service fee: A digital lender charges borrowers a ZMW 500 “platform fee” per loan, separate from interest. If ZRA treats this fee as a taxable supply of a service (rather than an exempt financial service), VAT of 16% applies, making the total charge ZMW 580. The lender must register for VAT, charge and collect the tax, and remit it to ZRA. Failure to do so exposes the entity to back-assessments, penalties, and interest.
Where a Zambian-licensed financial service provider makes payments to non-resident entities, for example, technology-licence fees to a foreign parent company, management fees, or interest on intercompany loans, withholding-tax obligations arise. The applicable rates depend on the nature of the payment and whether a double-taxation agreement exists between Zambia and the recipient’s jurisdiction. Newly formalised providers must build withholding-tax compliance into their payment processes from day one of licensing.
Entities within corporate groups that price intercompany loans below or above arm’s-length rates face transfer-pricing scrutiny from ZRA. The Act’s requirement for BOZ reporting of loan portfolios and pricing data means that ZRA may increasingly cross-reference BOZ data against tax filings. Industry observers expect this data-sharing dynamic to sharpen ZRA’s ability to identify transfer-pricing risk.
Worked example, bank versus non-bank lender taxable profit: A commercial bank earns ZMW 10 million in interest income and incurs ZMW 6 million in deductible operating costs, producing ZMW 4 million in taxable profit. A newly licensed non-bank lender earning the same ZMW 10 million may lack the infrastructure to claim the full range of deductions and may face additional compliance costs (audit fees, BOZ levies, IT-resilience investment) that are deductible but increase cash-flow demands. Both entities face the same headline corporate-tax rate, but the effective tax burden on a previously informal operator rises once full compliance costs are factored in.
Entities that formalise and hire staff to meet the Act’s governance and compliance requirements must register as employers with ZRA, deduct Pay-As-You-Earn (PAYE) from employee remuneration, and remit contributions to the National Pension Scheme Authority (NAPSA). These obligations apply from the date of first employment.
The Act introduces significant enforcement powers. Operating as a financial service provider without a BOZ licence is a criminal offence. Penalties under the Act include substantial fines and imprisonment. Claims circulating on social media regarding prison terms for unlicensed lending are broadly consistent with the Act’s enforcement architecture, though the specific terms and thresholds are set out in the penalty provisions of the statute itself.
BOZ enforcement actions may include licence suspension or revocation, directions to cease specific activities, administrative fines, and referral for criminal prosecution. Directors and officers of non-compliant entities face personal liability, including disqualification from holding future directorships in licensed providers. The Act also empowers BOZ to appoint statutory managers to take control of distressed or non-compliant entities.
Transitional provisions within the Act are designed to allow existing operators a defined period in which to apply for licensing under the new regime. However, until the commencement order is gazetted, the precise length of any transitional window remains to be confirmed. Entities should not interpret the uncommenced status as permission to delay preparation.
The following checklist is designed for compliance teams, company secretaries, and legal advisers working to prepare for licensing and ongoing supervision under Zambia’s Banking and Financial Services Act 2026.
Recommended timeline: Begin steps 1–4 immediately (months 1–3). Complete tax-reporting updates in months 3–6. Finalise application documentation and file with BOZ in months 6–9. Allow months 9–12 for BOZ review and any remediation. This 12-month plan assumes the commencement order is gazetted within the near term, adjust if further delays occur.
Scenario A, Small digital lender (fintech). A Lusaka-based fintech app lends ZMW 2 million per month to individual borrowers, charging interest and a platform fee. Under the 2026 Act, it must apply to BOZ for a licence as a financial service provider, meet minimum-capital requirements, submit periodic prudential returns, register for VAT if its platform fee constitutes a taxable supply, and file corporate income-tax returns on interest and fee revenue. Estimated first-year compliance cost: ZMW 350,000–500,000 in legal, audit, and IT-resilience investment.
Scenario B, Informal moneylender transitioning to licensed status. A sole proprietor in Kitwe lends personal funds at interest to small traders. Under the former Money-lenders Act, oversight was minimal. Under the 2026 Act, the individual must incorporate or formalise the business, apply for a BOZ licence, prepare fit-and-proper declarations, register with ZRA for income tax, and begin maintaining proper books and records. The transition converts an informal activity into a regulated, tax-compliant business, a fundamental shift in operational model.
Zambia’s Banking and Financial Services Act 2026 fundamentally reshapes the regulatory landscape for every financial service provider operating in or entering the Zambian market. Whether your organisation is a commercial bank adapting to harmonised reporting standards, a fintech preparing its first BOZ licence application, or a moneylender transitioning from the now-superseded Money-lenders Act framework, the message is the same: preparation must begin now, not when the commencement order is gazetted. The tax implications, from corporate income tax and VAT to withholding tax and transfer pricing, demand specialist analysis tailored to each entity’s structure and operations.
Engaging qualified legal and tax counsel at the earliest stage will reduce compliance risk, avoid criminal exposure, and position your business to operate with confidence within Zambia’s modernised financial regulatory framework.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Emmanuel Manda at Musa Dudhia & Co., a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 4 minutes ago
posted 5 minutes ago
posted 5 minutes ago
posted 6 minutes ago
posted 8 minutes ago
posted 10 minutes ago
posted 10 minutes ago
posted 4 hours ago
posted 6 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Advisory Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message