Our Expert in India
No results available
Last reviewed: June 7, 2026
As of June 7, 2026, withholding tax in India for foreign payments is governed primarily by Section 195 of the Income-tax Act, which requires every person making a payment to a non-resident to deduct Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) if the sum is chargeable to tax in India. Budget 2026 and the Income-tax Rules 2026 have introduced material changes that every payer, banker and in-house tax team must now absorb: the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) TCS rate has been streamlined to a flat 2 % in defined cases from April 1, 2026, and a new pair of remittance-compliance forms, Form 145 and Form 146, have replaced the legacy Forms 15CA/15CB for outward remittance reporting.
These changes affect companies, individuals and authorised dealer banks alike, demanding immediate updates to internal procedures, bank instructions and documentation packs.
Section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is the central provision that answers the question of what is withholding tax in India for foreign payments. It imposes a statutory obligation on every person responsible for paying any sum to a non-resident (or a foreign company) to deduct income-tax at the applicable rate, provided the income is chargeable to tax in India. The provision is broad: it covers not only salary-type payments but also royalties, fees for technical services (FTS), interest, dividends, capital gains on Indian assets, and any other income that has an Indian-source nexus.
Understanding this provision is critical because unlike TDS on domestic payments, where specific thresholds and rate sections apply, Section 195 operates as a catch-all. The payer bears the initial compliance risk: if TDS is not deducted and the non-resident fails to pay tax directly, the payer can be treated as an “assessee in default” under Section 201.
The trigger for TDS on foreign remittance under Section 195 is straightforward in principle but frequently litigated in practice. The obligation arises whenever two conditions are met simultaneously:
If the payment is entirely exempt, for instance, a reimbursement of expenses that does not constitute “income”, the payer may take the view that Section 195 does not apply. However, this position carries audit risk and, where doubt exists, it is advisable to apply to the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 195(2) or Section 197 for a nil or lower withholding certificate.
Section 195 uses the word “person” without qualification, which means the obligation extends to every category of taxpayer: companies, LLPs, partnership firms, individuals, Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs), trusts and associations of persons. Unlike several domestic TDS sections that exempt individuals below audit thresholds, Section 195 applies regardless of turnover or audit status. An individual paying a foreign consultant for advisory services must deduct TDS if the payment is chargeable to tax in India, the same rule that applies to a large listed company.
TDS under Section 195 must be deducted at the earlier of the following two events:
This “earlier of” rule is designed to ensure that the Revenue’s interest is protected regardless of how the payer structures its accounting entries. In practice, for most cross-border service payments, the payment date and the credit date often coincide, but payers with accrual-based booking should monitor journal entries carefully. A debit to “Professional fees payable” and a corresponding credit to the vendor’s account triggers the obligation even if the bank transfer has not yet been initiated.
The domestic withholding tax rates applicable under Section 195 vary by the nature of payment and the residential status of the payee. These are the base rates prescribed under the Income-tax Act; they apply where no Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) relief is available, or where the domestic rate is already lower than the treaty rate. For FY 2026-27, the key rates (before surcharge and cess) are set out in the table below.
| Payment Type | Domestic Rate (Act) | Typical DTAA Rate (Example) |
|---|---|---|
| Interest | 20 % | 10–15 % (e.g., India-USA, India-UK) |
| Dividends | 20 % | 10–15 % (e.g., India-Singapore, India-Netherlands) |
| Royalties | 20 % | 10–15 % (e.g., India-Germany, India-Japan) |
| Fees for Technical Services (FTS) | 20 % | 10–15 % (where treaty covers FTS separately) |
| Long-term capital gains (listed securities) | 12.5 % | Subject to treaty; may be taxable only in residence country |
| Other income (not specifically covered) | 30 % | Varies; “Other income” article typically taxes in residence state |
Effective rate after surcharge and cess. The base rates above must be grossed up for applicable surcharge and health & education cess. For a foreign company payee, the highest surcharge bracket can push the effective rate on royalties and FTS to approximately 21.84 % (20 % base + surcharge at 2 % + 4 % cess on total). Payers should calculate the effective rate using the prevailing surcharge slab applicable to the payee’s total Indian income.
Section 206AA, PAN absence. Where the non-resident payee does not hold or furnish a valid Indian PAN, Section 206AA requires withholding at the higher of: (a) the rate prescribed under the Act, (b) the rate in force, or (c) 20 %. In practice, this means that a non-resident without PAN will face a minimum 20 % withholding even if the DTAA rate is lower, unless a valid Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) and Form 10F are submitted and the payer relies on the treaty rate. The interplay between Section 206AA and DTAA relief remains a contested area; careful documentation is essential.
Treaty notes. India has an extensive DTAA network covering more than 90 countries. Where a treaty provides a lower rate, the payer can apply that rate at source, provided the non-resident supplies a valid TRC issued by the tax authority of the treaty partner, a completed Form 10F, a no-PE declaration (where relevant), and any other documentation the payer’s CA or the bank requires. Payers should reference the specific treaty article applicable to the payment (e.g., Article 12 for royalties, Article 11 for interest) and retain a copy of the treaty text on file.
One of the most common points of confusion for payers is the distinction between TDS on foreign remittance under Section 195 and TCS on foreign remittance under Section 206C(1G). Both operate on outbound payments, but they serve different statutory purposes and are collected by different persons. The 2026 changes, including the introduction of a flat LRS 2 % TCS rate in defined categories, make it essential to understand which regime applies to each payment.
Section 206C(1G) requires an authorised dealer bank to collect Tax Collected at Source (TCS) from the remitter when processing an outward remittance under the Reserve Bank of India’s Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS). From April 1, 2026, the TCS framework for LRS remittances has been rationalised. The key changes under the 2026 rules include:
Importantly, TCS is collected by the bank, not by the payer. The remitter does not “deduct” TCS, instead, the bank adds it to the remittance cost. The TCS paid is available as a credit against the remitter’s income-tax liability when filing their return. This is a crucial operational difference from TDS, where the payer withholds tax from the amount payable to the non-resident.
The relationship between TDS and TCS on the same payment is sometimes misunderstood. The general principle is:
Both can apply to the same transaction. For example, a company paying royalties to a US-based licensor must deduct TDS under Section 195 (at the treaty rate or domestic rate) and may also be required to bear LRS 2 % TCS collected by the bank when the net-of-TDS amount is remitted. In practice, many business-to-business payments fall outside the scope of LRS (which is primarily designed for individuals), so TCS under Section 206C(1G) typically bites on individual remittances rather than corporate payments routed through normal banking channels. However, payers should verify with their authorised dealer bank whether TCS applies to the specific remittance channel being used.
Example 1, Corporate royalty payment. An Indian software company pays ₹50 lakh in royalties to a UK-based licensor. Under the India-UK DTAA, the applicable rate is 15 %. TDS of ₹7.5 lakh (plus surcharge and cess) is deducted. The net amount of approximately ₹42.5 lakh is remitted to the UK entity. No LRS TCS applies (corporate remittance outside LRS scope).
Example 2, Individual education remittance. A parent remits ₹12 lakh to a university in Canada for a child’s tuition. The payment is not “income” chargeable to tax in India, so no TDS under Section 195 is required. However, TCS under Section 206C(1G) applies: on the amount exceeding the prescribed threshold, the bank collects TCS at the concessional rate (0.5 % if funded by education loan; otherwise the applicable LRS rate). The TCS paid is claimable as a credit in the parent’s income-tax return.
Example 3, Individual paying a foreign consultant. A freelance designer in Mumbai pays ₹8 lakh to a US-based graphic design studio for services. If the payment is chargeable to tax in India (as FTS), TDS must be deducted under Section 195. Additionally, the bank may collect LRS 2 % TCS on the remittance amount. The combined tax cost should be mapped in advance to avoid cash-flow surprises.
The 2026 overhaul of remittance reporting forms is one of the most operationally significant changes for payers and authorised dealer banks. Under the Income-tax Rules 2026, Form 145 and Form 146 have replaced the earlier Forms 15CA and 15CB, respectively, for all outward remittances requiring tax reporting. The transition took effect from FY 2026-27, and banks are now required to accept only the new forms.
Form 145 is the remitter’s declaration. It is filed electronically by the person making the outward remittance and serves as a self-certification that the remitter has complied with all applicable TDS obligations under Section 195 (or that the payment is not chargeable to tax). Form 145 broadly corresponds to the erstwhile Form 15CA but incorporates additional data fields, including DTAA-related declarations, the non-resident’s tax identification number, and cross-references to any CA certificate obtained.
Form 145 must be uploaded on the Income Tax Department’s e-filing portal before the remittance is processed by the authorised dealer bank. The portal generates an acknowledgement number, which the payer must share with the bank as part of the remittance documentation pack.
Form 146 is the certificate issued by a chartered accountant (CA) or, in defined cases, by an authorised officer. It broadly replaces the erstwhile Form 15CB. Form 146 contains the CA’s independent verification of:
Form 146 is mandatory where the remittance exceeds the prescribed threshold or where the payer claims treaty benefits. For remittances below the threshold and not claiming DTAA relief, the payer may file Form 145 without a CA certificate, although retaining a voluntary CA certificate is strongly recommended as an audit defence measure.
Payers who were accustomed to the 15CA/15CB workflow should note the following transition points regarding 15CA 15CB 2026 changes:
Authorised dealer banks require a standardised documentation pack before processing an outward remittance. The following checklist reflects the standard requirements under the new framework for outward remittance documents India:
Banks routinely reject remittance requests for documentation deficiencies. The most frequent rejection reasons, and their remedies, include:
Ensuring seamless compliance with India’s withholding tax framework for foreign payments requires coordination across multiple functions. The checklists below are designed for immediate adoption by in-house teams.
Penalties snapshot. Non-deduction or late deduction of TDS under Section 195 attracts interest under Section 201(1A) at 1 % per month (from the date of deductibility to the date of actual deduction) and 1.5 % per month (from the date of deduction to the date of deposit). Penalty under Section 271C, equal to the amount of TDS not deducted, may also be levied, though the payer can establish “reasonable cause” as a defence. Failure to file TDS returns on time attracts a late-filing fee under Section 234E (₹200 per day of delay, capped at the TDS amount). These consequences underscore why proactive compliance, rather than remedial correction, is always the more cost-effective approach.
While withholding tax obligations are statutory, the law provides several legitimate mechanisms to reduce the effective rate. Payers should treat these as standard operating procedures rather than exceptional planning tools.
To claim a reduced treaty rate at the point of withholding, the payer must assemble a complete evidence pack:
The payer should retain all these documents for the statutory retention period and reference the specific DTAA article in the Form 146 certificate (or in the self-certification within Form 145).
Where the payer believes that the income is not chargeable to tax in India, or that the applicable rate should be lower than the statutory rate, two formal application routes are available:
Aggressive withholding positions, such as treating a payment as entirely non-taxable without an AO determination or failing to obtain a TRC while applying a DTAA rate, invite scrutiny during assessment proceedings. The likely practical consequences include disallowance of the expenditure under Section 40(a)(i) (for failure to deduct TDS) and a demand for interest and penalty under Section 201. Payers should therefore maintain a contemporaneous “withholding analysis memo” for each significant foreign payment, documenting the legal basis for the rate applied, the DTAA article relied upon, and the supporting evidence obtained.
| Entity Type | Withholding Obligation (TDS/TCS) | Form(s) & Bank Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| Company (resident payer) | Deduct TDS under Section 195 if payment is chargeable to tax in India; bank may additionally collect TCS for LRS-type remittances | Form 145 (declaration) ± Form 146 (CA certificate); bank to verify documentation and collect TCS where applicable |
| Individual payer (non-audit) | Same TDS obligation under Section 195 applies regardless of turnover or audit status; operationally higher risk if internal controls are absent | Form 145 (mandatory if remittance requires reporting); retain TRC, Form 10F and contract copy; bank may request additional evidence |
| Bank (authorised dealer) | Collect TCS under Section 206C(1G) where statutory (LRS remittances by individuals); verify TDS compliance before processing | Bank collects TCS at source, requires Form 145 acknowledgement and supporting remitter declarations, uploads data to RBI and Income Tax Department |
This table is designed as a quick-reference grid for compliance teams. For detailed payment-wise rate analysis, refer to the withholding tax rates India 2026 table above, and for form-filling guidance, consult the Forms 145/146 sections of this article.
Understanding what is withholding tax in India for foreign payments is no longer a one-time exercise, it is an ongoing compliance discipline that demands updated processes, current documentation and proactive planning. The 2026 changes, from the introduction of Form 145 and Form 146 to the rationalisation of LRS TCS at 2 %, have reset the compliance baseline for every entity making cross-border payments from India.
Payers should take the following immediate steps:
Cross-border tax compliance in India continues to grow in complexity, and the cost of errors, from disallowance of deductions to penalty proceedings, far exceeds the cost of rigorous upfront planning. Businesses making regular outward remittances should consider engaging a qualified cross-border tax specialist to conduct a compliance health check and establish defensible internal controls for FY 2026-27 and beyond.
This article was produced by Global Law Experts. For specialist advice on this topic, contact Tushar Jarwal at DMD Advocates, a member of the Global Law Experts network.
posted 6 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 7 hours ago
posted 8 hours ago
posted 8 hours ago
posted 9 hours ago
posted 9 hours ago
posted 9 hours ago
posted 10 hours ago
posted 10 hours ago
posted 11 hours ago
posted 11 hours ago
No results available
Find the right Advisory Expert for your business
Sign up for the latest advisor briefings and news within Global Advisory Experts’ community, as well as a whole host of features, editorial and conference updates direct to your email inbox.
Naturally you can unsubscribe at any time.
Global Law Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional legal services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced lawyers, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Global Advisory Experts is dedicated to providing exceptional advisory services to clients around the world. With a vast network of highly skilled and experienced advisors, we are committed to delivering innovative and tailored solutions to meet the diverse needs of our clients in various jurisdictions.
Send welcome message